Nissan Qashqai vs Volvo XC40
HSA CAR REVIEWS
HSA CAR REVIEWS
2025 Nissan Qashqai vs Volvo Black Edition
| Aspect | Nissan Qashqai 2025 (Premium) | Volvo Black Edition (Premium) |
|---|---|---|
| Photo | ||
| Styling / Trim | Refreshed design, modern LED, some premium touches | All-black exterior accents, gloss black badging, black wheels |
| Engine / Performance | 1.3 L mild hybrid or e-Power system, ~140-160 PS, ~9.5 s 0-62 mph (in some trims) | Hybrid / plug-in or premium petrol/hybrid, more torque, refined performance |
| Fuel Economy / Emissions | Good efficiency for its class, lower emissions in hybrid mode | Excellent when electric/hybrid mode used, higher when engine runs hard |
| Space / Practicality | ~504 L boot, compact footprint, good for family use | Larger premium SUV space, more room, higher comfort |
| Interior & Tech | Quality materials in top trims, modern infotainment and aids | Premium interior finishes, advanced driver assist, higher luxury level |
| Safety / Reliability | Strong safety kit, credible reliability | Excellent safety reputation, full suite of advanced features |
| Cost / Maintenance | Lower running cost, more affordable servicing | Higher maintenance and part costs, but premium resale potential |
HSA CAR REVIEWS
Cons & Downsides — Premium Comparison
🚗 Nissan Qashqai 2025 (Premium / e-Power)
- Not a full EV — relies on petrol engine for generation; limited electric-only driving.
- Slower than premium SUVs (≈ 9–10 s 0–62 mph).
- Interior quality good, but not true luxury level.
- Slightly more road/wind noise at motorway speeds vs top-tier rivals.
- Infotainment solid, but behind Volvo’s Google-based system.
- AWD availability varies by market; some trims FWD only.
- Residual value typically lower than luxury-brand SUVs.
🚙 Volvo Black Edition (Premium SUV)
- Higher purchase price and running costs.
- Servicing/repairs costlier due to premium parts & hybrid complexity.
- Heavier; a bit less nimble in tight city manoeuvres.
- Plug-in hybrid electric-only range modest (~25–35 miles in many versions).
- More complex tech can mean higher maintenance risk long term.
- Insurance/tax often higher bands.
- Black Edition is largely aesthetic—no big mechanical performance gain.
HSA CAR REVIEWS
HSA CAR REVIEWS
Final Verdict & Ratings
🏁 Overall Verdict
Nissan Qashqai 2025 (Premium / e-Power) – Smart, efficient and refined for its class,
with excellent practicality and lower costs. Falls slightly short on true luxury feel.
Volvo Black Edition (Premium SUV) – Luxurious, safe and prestige-focused with refined
performance. Costs more to buy and maintain, but delivers a genuine premium experience.
⭐ Ratings (out of 100)
Nissan Qashqai 2025 (Premium)
78 / 100
Volvo Black Edition (Premium SUV)
85 / 100
🟨 Verdict: Volvo Black Edition edges ahead on luxury & safety tech. Qashqai wins on value & efficiency.
💬 Share Your Thoughts